<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David White: Big understanding &#8211; The value of typologies of engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dougclow.org/2011/02/07/david-white/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dougclow.org/2011/02/07/david-white/</link>
	<description>New Technology in Higher Education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Pegler</title>
		<link>http://dougclow.org/2011/02/07/david-white/#comment-1361</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Pegler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 22:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougclow.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many thanks Doug. I don&#039;t know how you manage to capture all that. We&#039;ve opted for having a public version of this podcast available - its not usually the case for eLearning Community events. But no questions and answers in this version (you had to be there!). Or you can get a feel for the conversation from Doug above. 

For the recording go to http://podcast.open.ac.uk/pod/1069 

Chris]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Doug. I don&#8217;t know how you manage to capture all that. We&#8217;ve opted for having a public version of this podcast available &#8211; its not usually the case for eLearning Community events. But no questions and answers in this version (you had to be there!). Or you can get a feel for the conversation from Doug above. </p>
<p>For the recording go to <a href="http://podcast.open.ac.uk/pod/1069" rel="nofollow">http://podcast.open.ac.uk/pod/1069</a> </p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Cann</title>
		<link>http://dougclow.org/2011/02/07/david-white/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AJ Cann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 06:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougclow.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-1355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the writeup Doug.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the writeup Doug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://dougclow.org/2011/02/07/david-white/#comment-1353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jennifer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 21:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dougclow.wordpress.com/?p=432#comment-1353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coo-er, what a load of fascinating stuff!  Thanks for the writeup.  

Just went &amp; had a look at David&#039;s blog too - also v interesting.  

I think about some of this a lot - what I put online &amp; what I don&#039;t, who my audience is, etc etc.  

Yes, digital natives is the wrong metaphor - none of this was around when I was born, so by that division I should count as an immigrant, but that&#039;s not at all how I experience it.  &quot;Resident&quot; doesn&#039;t feel quite right either though.  ::ponders::

What feels more true to me is like:  everyone has their valency bonds of social/practical connection with the rest of the world, and for some people a substantial proportion of those links/channels/connections go through the net, and for others not so much, or none, or almost none (i.e. a sliding variable not binary).  

For me the proportion is quite high, and I imagine an onlooker wedded to the resident/visitor metaphor would classify me as &quot;resident&quot;.  But I&#039;m iffy about it.  Not convinced :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coo-er, what a load of fascinating stuff!  Thanks for the writeup.  </p>
<p>Just went &amp; had a look at David&#8217;s blog too &#8211; also v interesting.  </p>
<p>I think about some of this a lot &#8211; what I put online &amp; what I don&#8217;t, who my audience is, etc etc.  </p>
<p>Yes, digital natives is the wrong metaphor &#8211; none of this was around when I was born, so by that division I should count as an immigrant, but that&#8217;s not at all how I experience it.  &#8220;Resident&#8221; doesn&#8217;t feel quite right either though.  ::ponders::</p>
<p>What feels more true to me is like:  everyone has their valency bonds of social/practical connection with the rest of the world, and for some people a substantial proportion of those links/channels/connections go through the net, and for others not so much, or none, or almost none (i.e. a sliding variable not binary).  </p>
<p>For me the proportion is quite high, and I imagine an onlooker wedded to the resident/visitor metaphor would classify me as &#8220;resident&#8221;.  But I&#8217;m iffy about it.  Not convinced <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
